I used to teach advanced classes to engineers at large corporations (Apple, Microsoft, etc…) which was really interesting. But here I should probably do a weekly ratio of 3:2:1 for Easy, Intermediate and Hard level articles. Then once or twice a month I can go down the rabbit hole and write engineering level articles.
I like to know the theory as well, but I may not be able to understand all of it. When I understand how and why things work, I am much more effective at fixing them!!
Mike, consider inserting “sidebar” comments for deeper dives into the theory and engineering aspects. That would give those who understand and crave more details a path to quench their thirst for that level of detail while not losing those of us who only need troubleshooting guidance.
best way to do it. I now understand amps, volts, and a have better understanding of how solar power works My friend just likes the easy stuff cause he is not into that. I don't use a RV, only here for the education.
My daily blog (what you’re reading here) is hosted on a server running SubStack, which is a database software engine that manages all my RVelectricity articles and subscribers.
I checked 3. I also like access to as much info as possible, even if I don't grasp it all, maybe I can learn something. Perhaps write the primary article at one level, with a link to a higher level. I know, more work for you. You asked!
Think of yourself as a Trade School that teaches folks the reality of how electricity works with regards to a RV and how to solve RV electrical problems rather than a University that teaches electrical theory.
Sure there are folks that are interested in the theory aspect. Those folks represent 25% of the responses to you poll at the time of this post.
You have found out who your audience is. Direct your teachings to the 75% and NOT the 25%!
I think the mix you've been providing has been great! Some of the very basic things to keep us all safe, then more in-depth troubleshooting for those of us who venture into it, INCLUDING the REASONING behind what you present! "Inquiring minds want to know!" 8^)
Mike, you should go through the safety considerations, theory of operation as you diagnose the problem and how you arrive at your resolution. So incorporating #2, #3, & #4 would be of most interest for me. I am a retired Electrical Power and Electronics Communications Engineer.
I choose trouble shooting but it would be more accurate to say: "keep the current mix". If I'm not interested in a topic, I just quit reading or skim the rest.
Hi Mike. I checked intermediate, but sometimes in depth is needed to help explain. Like explaining hot skin conditions is an example.
I used to teach advanced classes to engineers at large corporations (Apple, Microsoft, etc…) which was really interesting. But here I should probably do a weekly ratio of 3:2:1 for Easy, Intermediate and Hard level articles. Then once or twice a month I can go down the rabbit hole and write engineering level articles.
Or maybe begin explanation with basic, then in next paragraph do the in depth.
Whatever way you do it, you will do a great job
That sounds good, it needs to be interesting for you too.
The level and mix you have been doing is good for me :)
Checked 2, but 3 & 4 also has great interest for me.
Agree with Michel Poirier. Checked 2, but 3 & 4 also interest me.
I'd like to see oscilloscope images for inverter and generator outputs.
I like the idea of mixing it up. The beginners may get inspired to advance their skills.
I like a spread of articles. Even if I don't quite understand the deeper stuff, I still learn something.
Just keep mixing it up Mike.
Hi Mike, I believe one needs to know a little theory to really understand how to troubleshoot electrical issues
Thx for the great info. Very helpful
I agree, which is why I never like to give a simple yes or no answer.
I like to know the theory as well, but I may not be able to understand all of it. When I understand how and why things work, I am much more effective at fixing them!!
Mike, consider inserting “sidebar” comments for deeper dives into the theory and engineering aspects. That would give those who understand and crave more details a path to quench their thirst for that level of detail while not losing those of us who only need troubleshooting guidance.
Thanks for all you do for us.
Let me see if there’s a way to do a sidebar link in SubStack. That would be great if it can be made to easily work
best way to do it. I now understand amps, volts, and a have better understanding of how solar power works My friend just likes the easy stuff cause he is not into that. I don't use a RV, only here for the education.
I don't even know what a "substack" is! That term has just popped up lately. I guess I'm being left behind.
My daily blog (what you’re reading here) is hosted on a server running SubStack, which is a database software engine that manages all my RVelectricity articles and subscribers.
I checked 3. I also like access to as much info as possible, even if I don't grasp it all, maybe I can learn something. Perhaps write the primary article at one level, with a link to a higher level. I know, more work for you. You asked!
As a DIY guy who likes to help people I need the details.
Mike,
Think of yourself as a Trade School that teaches folks the reality of how electricity works with regards to a RV and how to solve RV electrical problems rather than a University that teaches electrical theory.
Sure there are folks that are interested in the theory aspect. Those folks represent 25% of the responses to you poll at the time of this post.
You have found out who your audience is. Direct your teachings to the 75% and NOT the 25%!
Checked 3, sometimes over my head, but often gives me better insight into topic. So sometimes more is just right. Thanks for asking
I find your articles interesting and useful. It's good to have to think about things and use your brain to comprehend subjects that are difficult.
I think the mix you've been providing has been great! Some of the very basic things to keep us all safe, then more in-depth troubleshooting for those of us who venture into it, INCLUDING the REASONING behind what you present! "Inquiring minds want to know!" 8^)
Mike, you should go through the safety considerations, theory of operation as you diagnose the problem and how you arrive at your resolution. So incorporating #2, #3, & #4 would be of most interest for me. I am a retired Electrical Power and Electronics Communications Engineer.
I choose trouble shooting but it would be more accurate to say: "keep the current mix". If I'm not interested in a topic, I just quit reading or skim the rest.