Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Loel H's avatar

I too would like an explanation as well as further clarification. In real world application, such as in an RV that is not used full time and spends , say, 50% of the time on shore power, is the loss or degradation significant? For example: if the degradation is say an additional 10% for a system that is rated for 80% of capacity at 10K cycles. Is that really significant? Is it worth scrapping the 3 -12v 100 Ah of BB batteries you bough 3 years ago and cycled 100 times camping during that time period because you wanted to double your capacity at 1/5th the cost by add a Eco-worthy 12V 314Ah? I can understand engineers saying "for best results you need to replace the entire system" but is it cost effective to get maximum efficiency?

Mike Miles's avatar

I'd be interested in a technical explanation of why different-capacity LiFePO4 batteries which each have their own built-in BMS can't be paralleled, especially if they have essentially the same voltage vs. % SOC profile (same type of internal cells). At a glance, each battery should readily deal with the bus voltage (as a single battery does), and when it reaches full charge or minimum charge, the BMS should happily disconnect it. If the wiring is good, they should even contribute their proportional share of capacity, at least near the end of discharge, where the terminal voltage will allow better current sharing. Is there a physical explanation of any performance detriment that a BMS would allow, simply due to a neighboring battery (or even two or three identical neighboring batteries, together having more capacity) being connected?

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?